From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Apr 23 19:31:19 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f3NIUQC08272
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:30:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3NIUND08254
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:30:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from correo2.servidoresdns.net ([195.55.179.61])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3NIUH215509
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:30:22 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:28:47 +0200
Message-Id: <200104232028.AA755106266@correo2.servidoresdns.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From: "cabrejas" <cabrejas@ceinrema.com>
Reply-To: <cabrejas@ceinrema.com>
X-Sender: <sb0691@correo2.servidoresdns.net>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: <IMail v6.04>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk id f3NIUOD08255
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk


Hi all,

After a tournament like Tour I in Bristol this last weekend, it is normal to send messages saying how well things worked and Iīm sure others will do that much better than me.

But there is another side to it, and I just wanted to mention the things that could have been better. Before Tour I, I remember reading something about a cheap food option. In the future it may be better to refer to it like fast food, so nobody gets disappointed. I didnīt find it especially cheap, especially since we were told not to bring any food or drinks into the venue (I admit I didnīt understand the reason for that, with or without foot and mouth).

And I also remember reading loads of comments on hot water. It almost seemed like we would be going into a sauna after the games. Well, I donīt know about the female showers, but the male showers were not hot at all. No wonder somebody must have had a warm shower some time during the weekend but we "all" were supposed to have hot showers, not just some lucky ones.

I guess the organizers will not be so kind as to give part of our money back and Iīm sure some will say they are not the ones to blame. Well, who is it, then? In the future maybe the venues can be contracted on the basis that if not enough hot water is provided then we get some of our money back? I donīt know, but maybe we all can get some ideas going. And donīt get me wrong, a tenner up or down will not make much of a difference, but a service who is up to what is expected definitely would.

Finally, sorry for the lengthy e-mail, but Iīm sure Iīm not the only one who noticed this.

Kind regards,

Juan Carlos

Flyght Club