From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Thu Apr 18 11:35:07 2002 Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3IAZ6d07288 for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:35:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3IASN725292; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:28:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3IAIdQR010083 for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:18:40 +0100 (BST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g3IAId45010082 for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:18:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3IAIcQR010077 for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:18:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from tala.ossian.net ([195.188.137.9]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3IAIb723135 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:18:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from mrfantastic ([10.1.17.54]) by tala.ossian.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 527-54076U1500L200S0V35) with SMTP id net for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:18:20 +0100 From: "Barry" <barry@endzone.co.uk> To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Tour 1 Results Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: <NFBBLGMGDMOALNNAFLPNAEBKCNAA.barry@endzone.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <dfdaZhAQacv8EwyQ@phidelta.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Wayne, > > Smash & Grab (11) have worked their up to 8th, and Fusion (6) took the > Plate for 13th. I'm reasoning that this exchange of positions commenced > in their Pool F game - could anyone enlighten me further, please? I also > calculate that Smash met Poco, but Poco were victorious. What was the > scorline here? > > You are quite right, this exchange of positions did indeed start in the pool play. Both Fusion and Smash & Grab are changed from last year (only 3 of Fusions roster are veterans from last year). The game was a titanic struggle with Smash & Grab sneaking through in sudden death. We'll get them next time! Barry