From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Wed Apr 10 13:56:11 2002 Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3ACuAd05098 for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:56:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3ACtE719211; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:55:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3ACmiQR019373 for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:48:45 +0100 (BST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g3ACmiRK019372 for britdisc-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:48:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g3ACmhQR019367 for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:48:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from imo-m09.mx.aol.com (imo-m09.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.164]) by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3ACmht15614 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:48:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from Filrichardson@aol.com by imo-m09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id 8.78.24d172bd (3982) for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:48:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Filrichardson@aol.com Message-ID: <78.24d172bd.29e58e9d@aol.com> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:48:29 EDT Subject: Re: Mixed Teams In Major Tournaments To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_78.24d172bd.29e58e9d_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows UK sub 52 Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk --part1_78.24d172bd.29e58e9d_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/04/2002 13:46:58 GMT Daylight Time, Filrichardson writes: > Subj:Re: Mixed Teams In Major Tournaments > Date:10/04/2002 13:46:58 GMT Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:Filrichardson">Filrichardson</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com">funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com</A> > > > > I dont think we should be trying to regulate teams. Geo teams should be > the way forward as they train together but to say you must go to a team > just because there 10 miles closer that that one is daft! > > Fil > Discophilia/Sublime > > > In a message dated 09/04/2002 22:49:26 GMT Daylight Time, > funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com writes: > > > >> Subj:Re: Mixed Teams In Major Tournaments >> Date:09/04/2002 22:49:26 GMT Daylight Time >> From:<A HREF="mailto:funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com">funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com</A> >> To:<A HREF="mailto:ben@ravilious.net">ben@ravilious.net</A>, <A HREF="mailto:britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk">britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk</A> >> Sent from the Internet >> >> >> >> >Playing in international tournaments is fantastic fun and I'm glad I've >> > >been lucky enough to have done this on a number of occasions myself. >> > >However, as individual players we must recognise that doing this should >> >> > >be on the basis of long-term commitment to a team. If we have this >> >attitude then we will end up with more committed teams and therefore more >> >> > >*individual* players getting the chance to attend. Heck if you're not >> > >going to Hawaii go to Brugge/Rotterdam/Rimini/wherever instead - you >> will >> > >still have a good time and you don't need UK Ultimate to approve your >> > >roster for this!!! >> >> Ben, >> I have to agree with you on the player loyalty issue. I've played for >> BAF for about 5 years now, through my university career in Scotland. I >> think >> player loyalty is hard as Ultimate comes from a student base, and as such >> a >> lot of younger (no offense to 'older' players) players move around the >> country a lot as they go to uni and the struggle to find a job. I may well >> >> have this wrong but for geo teams aren't you supposed to live nearer them >> than any other team? These two things just don't add up. If I am right >> (doubtful) on the geo team thing, can't we have some kind of waver for >> players who have been at the club for a decent length of time? Sorry if >> I've >> got my facts wrong but I can't check them at the moment. >> >> Le Boeuf >> #44 >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. >> >> > > > Fil (the Scraggy one with odd hair) --part1_78.24d172bd.29e58e9d_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 10/04/2002 13:46:58 GMT Daylight Time, Filrichardson writes:<BR> <BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj:<B>Re: Mixed Teams In Major Tournaments </B><BR> Date:10/04/2002 13:46:58 GMT Daylight Time<BR> From:<A HREF="mailto:Filrichardson">Filrichardson</A><BR> To:<A HREF="mailto:funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com">funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com</A><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> I dont think we should be trying to regulate teams. Geo teams should be the way forward as they train together but to say you must go to a team just because there 10 miles closer that that one is daft!<BR> <BR> Fil <BR> Discophilia/Sublime<BR> <BR> <BR> In a message dated 09/04/2002 22:49:26 GMT Daylight Time, funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com writes:<BR> <BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj:<B>Re: Mixed Teams In Major Tournaments </B><BR> Date:09/04/2002 22:49:26 GMT Daylight Time<BR> From:<A HREF="mailto:funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com">funky_like_a_train@hotmail.com</A><BR> To:<A HREF="mailto:ben@ravilious.net">ben@ravilious.net</A>, <A HREF="mailto:britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk">britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk</A><BR> <I>Sent from the Internet </I><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> >Playing in international tournaments is fantastic fun and I'm glad I've <BR> > >been lucky enough to have done this on a number of occasions myself. <BR> > >However, as individual players we must recognise that doing this should <BR> > >be on the basis of long-term commitment to a team. If we have this<BR> >attitude then we will end up with more committed teams and therefore more <BR> > >*individual* players getting the chance to attend. Heck if you're not <BR> > >going to Hawaii go to Brugge/Rotterdam/Rimini/wherever instead - you will <BR> > >still have a good time and you don't need UK Ultimate to approve your <BR> > >roster for this!!!<BR> <BR> Ben,<BR> I have to agree with you on the player loyalty issue. I've played for <BR> BAF for about 5 years now, through my university career in Scotland. I think <BR> player loyalty is hard as Ultimate comes from a student base, and as such a <BR> lot of younger (no offense to 'older' players) players move around the <BR> country a lot as they go to uni and the struggle to find a job. I may well <BR> have this wrong but for geo teams aren't you supposed to live nearer them <BR> than any other team? These two things just don't add up. If I am right <BR> (doubtful) on the geo team thing, can't we have some kind of waver for <BR> players who have been at the club for a decent length of time? Sorry if I've <BR> got my facts wrong but I can't check them at the moment.<BR> <BR> Le Boeuf<BR> #44<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> _________________________________________________________________<BR> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.<BR> <BR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR> <BR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR> <BR> Fil (the Scraggy one with odd hair)</FONT></HTML> --part1_78.24d172bd.29e58e9d_boundary--