From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Apr  9 10:53:16 2002
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g399q3d12404
	for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:52:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g399oZt21887;
	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:50:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g399kfQR006997
	for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:46:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g399kfl9006996
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:46:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g399keQR006991
	for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:46:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.ravilious.net ([212.38.89.2])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g399kd713546
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:46:39 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue,  9 Apr 2002 10:57:27 +0100
Message-Id: <200204091057.AA1743323612@mail.ravilious.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Ben Ravilious" <ben@ravilious.net>
Reply-To: <ben@ravilious.net>
X-Sender: <ben@mail.ravilious.net>
To: Andy Cotgreave  <Andy.Cotgreave@RCP.co.uk>, <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Rostering
X-Mailer: <IMail v6.05>
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk


I'll stick them up on the website tonight.

Just received them from Chris.

Ben


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Andy Cotgreave <Andy.Cotgreave@RCP.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:33:54 +0100 

>hi there,
>Have the rostering rules been finalised for the Tour yet? We've got some
>questions we need answered before the weekend, and would like to see the
>rules asap. If we don't get the rules in time for the weekend, will
>UkUltimate or the Tour committee be prepared for some rostering changes
>between tours 1 and 2? without the rules, no teams can correctly roster
>themselves, presumably?
>
>cheers,
>Andy
>
>PS - again, i'm impressed by the levels of organisation this year, and i
>appreciate all the effort being put into making UKU work!
>