From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Fri Feb 1 08:23:09 2002 Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g118KmC19386 for <suaaz@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:20:48 GMT Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@agave [137.205.192.52]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1186wE24246; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:06:58 GMT Received: from agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daemon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g118380K014613 for <britdisc-outgoing@agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:03:08 GMT Received: (from daemon@localhost) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g11838iE014612 for britdisc-outgoing; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:03:08 GMT Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by agave.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g118370K014607 for <britdisc-real@majordomo.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:03:07 GMT Received: from mail1.birmingham.gov.uk ([195.224.57.69]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g11835E23857 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:03:06 GMT Received: from birmingham.gov.uk (unverified) by mail1.birmingham.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T58cd1abe710a5ac1c90d2@mail1.birmingham.gov.uk> for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:56:44 +0000 Received: by birmingham.gov.uk(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 80256B53.002B5CAE ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:53:37 +0000 X-Lotus-FromDomain: BCC From: "Simon Statham" <Simon_Statham@birmingham.gov.uk> To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Message-ID: <80256B53.002B5B5C.00@birmingham.gov.uk> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:01:49 +0000 Subject: RE: Tour II Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Sorry, can't honour that request to keep your head... To be fair there are plenty of Student-only tournaments which us oldies can't enter so the fact that some of you can't make Tour 2 'cos of exams should be something you have to sort out. Also, every year we see student teams entering Tours 1 and 2, then all the players go home for the summer and they don't enter Tours 3 and 4. This means they ruin the chance for open teams to get a true national ranking, because they fill up places in Tours 1 and 2 and then don't finish the season. What we need are more non-Tour events being organised over the summer because the situation at the moment means that if you don't have enough girls in your club to play co-ed then you miss out on half of the tournaments of the summer. If there were more of these 'fun' events then maybe students teams wouldn't mind missing Tour 2 because of exams? We're going to organise one, so let's have some more. Si (Slipdisc) Giguere Stephen-BLUW31 <sgiguere@motorola.com> on 31/01/2002 17:21:08 To: "'Britdisc'" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> cc: (bcc: Simon Statham/Transportation/BCC) Subject: RE: Tour II I'd like to 2nd that and also request to keep my head. Tour II also seems to clash heavily with student exam time in Nottingham. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Adriano Vitali [mailto:avitali@ptc.com] Sent: 31 January 2002 16:52 To: 'Britdisc' Subject: Tour II Checking the events diary I've noticed that Tour II clashes with 2 continental tournaments. Is that a strong enough argument to look at moving Tour II to another date? Before I get my head bitten off, I know the diary was organized around other international events, I just wondered if there's scope at this point to make changes to accomodate other popular continental tournaments. VITO ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com **********************************************************************