From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Fri Apr 25 12:31:49 1997
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id MAA12351; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 12:02:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from venus.le.ac.uk by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk with ESMTP
	id MAA12337; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 12:01:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from hawk.le.ac.uk by venus.le.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
          Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:59:05 +0100
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:58:57 +0100 (BST)
From: Scott <iws1@leicester.ac.uk>
X-Sender: iws1@hawk
To: Diana Worman <scu10@central.susx.ac.uk>
cc: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Re: WUCC in Vancouver
In-Reply-To: <m0wKh23-00063oC@solb5.central.susx.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.970425114314.21640A-100000@hawk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Diana Worman wrote:

On the issue of eligibility;

The rules for the women's division state that 50% of each club team 
must consist of players from that club (with the associated eligibility 
rules applying to those players) the remaining 50% can be any women 
they like.  Nationality doesn't even come into it since this is a club 
competition not a National teams competition.

If the two women Ian refers to were banned from playing for the US 
national team this would have been an act by the UPA not the WFDF.

>  There should be stronger support within the BUF for situations like
>  this, perhaps the creation of a national womens league, and
>  encouragement for more geo-based womens teams.

So Dianna, since you have the enthusiasm why not become that "support 
within the BUF" I am sure Liz would welcome the help.

Scott
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
   SCOTT: Ian Scotland
    Tel: 0116 2525824
     Fax: 0116 2523154
      E-mail: iws1@le.ac.uk
       http://wol.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk/buf/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\