From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Thu Jan 3 12:38:25 2002 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g03CYhL06186 for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:34:43 GMT Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g03CYgu06178 for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:34:42 GMT Received: from mail1.messagelabs.com (mail.london-2.starlabs.net [212.125.75.4]) by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g03CYfF16485 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:34:42 GMT X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24385 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2002 12:30:29 -0000 Received: from mail.oyster.co.uk (HELO aurora.oyster.co.uk) (193.132.201.148) by server-10.tower-1.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2002 12:30:29 -0000 Received: by AURORA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <YMBF0TQZ>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:34:36 -0000 Message-ID: <7165D5A55FC4D41184DB00D0B7B9E62D036D64F5@AURORA> From: Roger Thomson <Roger.Thomson@oyster.com> To: "'Andy Cotgreave'" <Andy.Cotgreave@RCP.co.uk>, britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: RE: Nationals move Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:34:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk >Roger said the Open doesn't have much of a portfolio. I'd agree, but that's >only because it has been a struggling event, with problems locating a >suitable venue. Given time, I would expect this to become a respected event. True, but have you seen how packed the 2002 calendar is already? We're getting pretty well organised now as a community, and have a damned good schedule laid out for 2002 - maybe we should look again at whether we need a 'BUF Open'. At least discuss why we have it. Is it the Worthington Cup of our football-analogy world? I very much doubt Clapham would rush to enter a first team, especially as half of us will be learning to surf on Honolulu beach that weekend :-) I feel guilty for saying that because Nolan's a good friend and ex-teammate, but wasn't the unique selling proposition for this event to invite our friends from over the water to come and spend their time and Euros with us? At a time when we didn't have as many tournaments as we do now. Couldn't we just open ALL the tour events to any Euro teams which want to play, and host one of those in Brighton or Eastbourne to make it easy for them (a la Southampton)? Let's face it, the Xlr8rs are more likely to want to play a Co-ed tour than mix it with our top 8 teams. Sorry to complicate the discussion. Can't wait for the first competetive tournament of the season, Winter League #3, Silver Bear cu#1 -----Original Message----- From: Andy Cotgreave [mailto:Andy.Cotgreave@RCP.co.uk] Sent: 03 January 2002 11:47 To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: Nationals move I would also agree that Nationals isn't played at the right time of year. I've seen too many finals played in horrific conditions. When a game descends into a game against the elements, it's gone too far. We should do what we can to lessen that risk. Roger said the Open doesn't have much of a portfolio. I'd agree, but that's only because it has been a struggling event, with problems locating a suitable venue. Given time, I would expect this to become a respected event. Andy Chevron ----------------------------------------------------------- Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.