From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue Oct 23 16:20:28 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f9NFCnb11090
for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:49 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9NFCgX11063
for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from tala.ossian.net ([195.188.137.9])
by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9NFCeC27913
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mrfantastic ([10.1.17.54]) by tala.ossian.net
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 527-54076U1500L200S0V35)
with SMTP id net; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:32 +0100
From: "Barry O'Kane" <barry.okane@visitscotland.com>
To: "Andy Cox" <andycox23@hotmail.com>, <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: UK Ultimate Election & Candidates
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:31 +0100
Message-ID: <NFBBLGMGDMOALNNAFLPNCEABCGAA.barry.okane@visitscotland.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <F268FoEIncCQzDKhWl000010b5f@hotmail.com>
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
> [mailto:owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk]On Behalf Of Andy Cox
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:51 PM
> To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: UK Ultimate Election & Candidates
>
>
>
> >Feel free to contact them directly or question them on Britdisc.
>
> I was going to question Si Weeks on here but then realised he's cunningly
> not on email!
>
> If anyone can answer which areas he's planning to seperate the
> DoC position
> into I'd be interested. Is this going to end up putting more
> pressure on the
> Student and Womens representatives or are we going to end up with a move
> towards a couple of levels of beaurocracy with more people
> brought in below
> the board?
>
> Only question I've got, apart from the archive appears to be
> unavailable now
> - does anyone from the current committee know what's going on?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Angie
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>