From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue Jul 24 13:09:02 2001 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f6OC5hn09976 for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:05:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6OC5fI09968 for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:05:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from mee06.mee.com ([194.130.244.68]) by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6OC5eQ02526 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:05:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from mee01.mee.com (mee01.mee.com [194.130.245.17]) by mee06.mee.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6OC9BM16435 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:09:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from mukmsg02.meuk.mee.com ([10.226.79.201] (may be forged)) by mee01.mee.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/3.7W-mee01) with ESMTP id MAA14330 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:52:47 +0100 (BST) From: Guy.Kennett@meuk.mee.com Received: by mukmsg02.meuk.mee.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <PHAJVLKS>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:58:01 +0100 Message-ID: <900A7E55AE20F441AF80FBE427FE1A9A57FF69@mukmsg02.meuk.mee.com> To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: T4 Seedings Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:58:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Did anyone else have a problem with Leeds re-seeding themselves from 9th to 4th after Clapham pulled out of T4 at such short notice? Is there an "official" BUF rule for re-seeding after teams pull out between tours? Guy BAF OPEN