From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Apr  1 16:42:22 1997
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id OAA10239; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 14:42:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from tay.ed-coll.ac.uk by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk with ESMTP
	id OAA10234; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 14:42:01 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ed-coll.ac.uk ([194.82.165.16]) by tay.ed-coll.ac.uk
          (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA1292
          for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 14:43:14 +0100
Received: from Telford-Message_Server by ed-coll.ac.uk
	with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 01 Apr 1997 14:44:54 +0100
Message-Id: <s3411f66.071@ed-coll.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 14:44:25 +0100
From: Fraser Macrae <fraser@ed-coll.ac.uk>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Re[2]: rules question (Pick)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

wrt Rob's question...
Not sure.
Can the defense decline the pick call the same as a travel call and claim the turnover if the disc is not caught? 
I also remember reading somewhere (reference to problems in the US) that pick calls ought to be ignored if they do not interfere with the current play. This was to stop dodgy pick calls intended to stop play when teams are breaking away up field quickly and allow teams to mark up again and also called to stop the disc flowing into the zone. I can't remember this ever happening in the UK but as it relates to Rob's question I thought I'ld mention it.

Fraser
(Sneeeky's)

>>> Rob Mitchell <admrwm@ccg.acu.man.ac.uk> 04/01/97 12:05pm >>>

Text item: Text_1

      wrt Rafi's answer:
     
     so, if 'pick' is called with the disc in the air then the O player 
     fluffs the catch, the disc goes back to the thrower?
     
     rob, chevron