From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Fri Mar 30 10:53:28 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f2U9qix01403
	for britdisc-outgoing; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:52:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2U9qgx01391
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:52:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from judy.ic.ac.uk (judy.ic.ac.uk [155.198.5.28])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2U9qgL13905
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:52:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from juliet.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.5.4])
	by judy.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 14ivaC-00078D-00
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:52:40 +0100
Received: from icex6.cc.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.3.6])
	by juliet.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 14ivaV-0003jD-00
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:52:59 +0100
Received: from peter (dialup-10-4.net.ic.ac.uk [155.198.8.148]) by icex6.cc.ic.ac.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
	id CGZSDZYZ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:52:38 +0100
Message-ID: <005901c0b8fe$3a7935c0$07d8883e@peter>
From: "Jonathan Palmer" <jonathan.palmer@ic.ac.uk>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
References: <3AC449D7.EE1D0D44@ptc.com>
Subject: Re: Indoor zone
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:44:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Yeah but on that reasoning, you could band zone D and insist you only score
from you own endzone with an upside down throw, certainly would be more
spectacular!! Lets face it the yanks don't always get it right. I've played
indoors in the states on a roller hockey pitch with keyhole endzones, stall
of 10  and bouncing of the walls was legit.......it Sucked!!! I say the way
we play it is just fine, zone rocks.

Jon
Shrub

P.S. Poor old Uriel if we did ban zone - they'd have to rethink their entire
defence.......... :-)



----- Original Message -----
From: Adriano Vitali <avitali@ptc.com>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Indoor zone


> Just to quote another parallel with basketball. In the states, zone
> defence has been abolished, players are only allowed to defend man on
> man! This was done to quicken up the game and make it more spectacular.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> VITO
>
>
> Adriano Vitali
> PTC - Technical Support
> http://www.ptc.com/support/index.htm
>