From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Feb 13 16:54:27 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f1DGq4810054
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:52:04 GMT
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1DGq1h10028
	for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:52:02 GMT
Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90])
	by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1DGplF26471
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:52:01 GMT
Received: from ultimatum.demon.co.uk ([158.152.203.174])
	by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 14Sig6-0008Xz-0W
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:51:46 +0000
Subject: Re: BUF Events Reminder-A solution?
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:52:01 +0000
x-sender: ultimatum@pop3.demon.co.uk
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, January 22, 1998
From: Paul Hurt <paul@ultimatum.demon.co.uk>
To: "BritDisc" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <E14Sig6-0008Xz-0W@anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net>
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

>b) sounds like a good compromise..

Personally, I'd support the idea of splitting the golf and ultimate 
diaries. Saves wading thru events that don't interest you (and sometimes 
it takes a moment to figure out which sport a diary entry is for).

But:

Attachments? Personally, I almost never look at them. Too much hassle (no 
doubt some bright spark will recommend sending it as a Word or Excel file 
- aaarrgh!)

A web link? I like being able to check the diary without having to log 
on, then wait for some potentially slow web server to get its act 
together. (Isn't the BUF diary on the web anyway? How many people 
actually bother to look at the web version though?)

Why not just send two mails - one golf, one ultimate. Then just delete 
the one you're not interested in.

I'm sure those (few) of us who are concerned about clashes can easily do 
the cross-referencing.

Paul