From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Mon Feb 12 17:06:55 2001 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id f1CH41f00491 for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:04:01 GMT Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1CH3wh00477 for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:03:58 GMT Received: from rw-gw-02.BroadVision.com (bv200.broadvision.com [198.211.204.200] (may be forged)) by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1CH3PY08854 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:03:40 GMT Received: by rw-gw-02.broadvision.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <D85AMYGT>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:02:53 -0800 Message-ID: <45C4368325C2D411898E00062938B3E827F3CB@uk-msg-01.broadvision.com> From: "Travers, Neil" <Neil.Travers@BroadVision.com> To: Britdisc <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: RE: BUF Events Reminder Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:02:10 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk The main question is, how easy/difficult would this be for the person who runs the diary/reminder. If it is too much effort to do this, then there's no point in trying to argue about whether to do it or not. I'd vote for splitting them up. I don't want to see golf stuff and I would imagine some golfers don't want to see Ultimate stuff. If there were two separate reminders, they could still both be posted to britdisc and people could choose which one(s) they want to read. The only negative (for the reader) is it is more difficult to see clashes between Golf and Ultimate. -- Neil Travers