From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Wed Sep 13 20:58:38 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e8DJtsw08291
for britdisc-outgoing; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:55:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30])
by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8DJtrR08285
for <britdisc-real@pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:55:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mtcmta04.totalserve.net ([213.27.0.18])
by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8DJtl801264
for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:55:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from default ([213.27.43.137]) by
mtcmta04.totalserve.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with
SMTP id G0UCL704.36P; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 19:53:31 +0000
Message-ID: <001001c01dbb$394cd3c0$892b1bd5@default>
From: "Alastair Findlay" <Alastair@ultimate.totalserve.co.uk>
To: "Tim Rogers" <trogers@srv1.mech.ed.ac.uk>, <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
References: <39BF83A4.50FC9B3E@srv1.mech.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Annoying commercial messages!
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:45:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
errrrrrr. which annoying commercial messages would those be??????????
I cant remember seeing any.
ALi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Rogers" <trogers@srv1.mech.ed.ac.uk>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 2:39 PM
Subject: Annoying commercial messages!
> Does anyone know if it is possible to filter out commercial messages
> from Britdisc? I guess the problem is identifying those messages, so is
> it possible to just make a convention, where say the word "ultimate"
> appears in a signiture or somewhere in the message, and those messages
> which have not got this word get filtered out?
>
> Incidently, I am not too bothered about it, and don't expect anyone to
> spend any time doing it. It would just be nice.
>
> Enough disclaimers.
>
> Tim
> RSB
>