From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Thu Jun 29 13:05:21 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e5TC4pM08964
	for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e5TC4me08954
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pump3.york.ac.uk (pump3.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.131])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e5TC4hY25348
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from york.ac.uk (cst386.york.ac.uk [144.32.9.62])
	by pump3.york.ac.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e5TC4bv24683;
	Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:37 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <395B3B55.34AAE3@york.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:37 +0100
From: Aftershock <jbc102@york.ac.uk>
Organization: york.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: BritDisc <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Catch 22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

While the debate still rages on about Catch: If they had turned up to
Towcester with only three players (for some obscure reason) and
subsequently lost all their games (might not have happened, as my team
lost 15-1 against 6 fusion players!), then wouldn't they be in a similar
position (i.e. maybe not able to qualify for top 8, but 'clearly' one of
the top 4 teams). Would 'everyone' still be wanting them to be bumped
up? They can still make it on their own merits, so why the need to let
them in even if they fail.
Merely food for thought

Jaimie
YBK, Swamp Donkeys