From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue May 23 09:52:44 2000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) id e4N8IKs12226 for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 23 May 2000 09:18:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4N8IHp12209 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 May 2000 09:18:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from ox.rmplc.co.uk (ox.rmplc.co.uk [194.238.48.39]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e4N8IHV00133 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 May 2000 09:18:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from dns0.rmplc.net ([194.238.48.13] helo=mail.rmplc.net) by ox.rmplc.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #10) id 12u9Pq-0002gz-00 for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Tue, 23 May 2000 07:47:50 +0000 Received: from rmexchange.internal.rmplc.net (hercules.rmplc.co.uk [194.238.48.90]) by mail.rmplc.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA24177 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:47:50 +0100 (BST) Received: by rmexchange.internal.rmplc.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <LHNKWZVH>; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:47:48 +0100 Message-ID: <41F16105E0DAD211AE8A0008C7A4F12703267E7C@rmexchange.internal.rmplc.net> From: ANDY COTGREAVE <acotgreave@rm.com> To: Britdisc <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Tour 2 results Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:47:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk chris is going to announce it all formally, but to put everyone's minds at rest, the 12th position won't be left blank. therefore, 13th place becomes 12th, 14th becomes 13th, etc. Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: James Hewitson [mailto:james.hewitson@Zurich.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 8:30 AM > To: Britdisc > Subject: Fw: Tour 2 results > > > On 22nd May Andy Cotgreave wrote : > > >The way that we agreed was to treat Catch as if they had not > ever entered > this tournament. > >They get no points for Tour II, therefore, and are seeded > for Tour III > based on their Tour I position, as written in the rules. > > I might have missed the answer to this question in the pile > of e-mails sat > in my Inbox this morning but: > > Can we have a clarification on whether the points for 12th > place have simply > disappeared or whether those teams in 13th to 29th places > simply move up a > spot ? > > Balti > BAF 34 > STANDARD DISCLAIMER: This message is confidential. You should not copy it or disclose its contents to anyone. You may use and apply the information only for the intended purpose. Internet communications are not secure and therefore RM does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are only those of the author and not those of RM. If this email has come to you in error please delete it and any attachments.