From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Thu Sep 2 11:58:11 1999 Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA05804 for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 11:57:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (daffodil [137.205.192.30]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05796 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 11:57:20 +0100 (BST) From: darren.evans@target-systems.com Received: from FIREWALL.target-systems.com (mail.target-systems.com [194.168.207.2]) by daffodil.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA02178 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 11:57:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from as400a.target-systems.com by FIREWALL.target-systems.com (IBM Firewall for AS/400/4.2.0) id LAA002.78; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 11:55:43 GMT Received: by as400a.target-systems.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) id 802567E0.003C0547 ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 11:55:35 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: TARGET To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Message-ID: <802567E0.003C045B.00@as400a.target-systems.com> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 11:56:40 +0100 Subject: RE: Indoor Rule Clarification Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Angels Ultimate wrote: ""But the common practice in my experience is that the team that has gained possession as a result of the disc hitting the wall does not take the disc back to the point where the disc hit the wall. Instead the disc is simply picked up and put into play from whatever part of the court it has ended up in just the same as if it had been an incomplete pass."" .In my experience, if the disc hits the wall on the pull, it is taken from the point at which it hits the wall and is 'middled'. The same as it would if it went out on the pull outdoors. i therefore do not see why the rule should not apply for turnovers. For example: If the 'O' team huck a long pass, end-zone bound, and it hits the wall but lands in the 'D' teams end-zone, then the 'D' team are within their rights to walk the disk back to the point of contact with the wall. They should not be penalised yardage for the sloppy offence of the opposition. ""I have heard the occasional argument about bringing the disc back to the point where it hit the wall but I can't think of any point in playing this way."" .Many indoor tournaments are played in leisure centres with a dividing net between pitches. I've never seen a disc bounce off a net! Therefore we would need 2 separate rules. One for each side of the pitch!! It is probably best left to the particular TD to rule as they see fit. Merely an opinion Two Hands Night Fever Ultimate