From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Fri Sep 27 12:42:01 1996
Received: from thistle.csv.warwick.ac.uk by clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk with ESMTP
	id MAA23018; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:41:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: by thistle.csv.warwick.ac.uk
	id MAA21501; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:26:27 +0100 (BST)
Received: from amsta.leeds.ac.uk by thistle.csv.warwick.ac.uk with SMTP
	id MAA21493; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:26:19 +0100 (BST)
Received: from newton.leeds.amsta (newton.leeds.ac.uk [129.11.36.64]) by amsta.leeds.ac.uk (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA29428 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:27:39 +0100
Received: by newton.leeds.amsta (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id MAA02233; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:29:11 +0100
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:29:11 +0100
From: amtsjh@amsta.leeds.ac.uk (S J Hill)
Message-Id: <199609271129.MAA02233@newton.leeds.amsta>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: nationals
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Sender: owner-britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

hi

just a small comment on something Kev said... I would just like to 
clarify something about the pools....

I always imagine that the term "peer pools" implies that you are really
only playing for seeding and the competition proper starts in the next round!

This is not the case for Nationals.

There are 2 division of 8, and they are split into 2 pools each.
They are not peer pools - the teams are distributed across the whole entry
*within each division of 8*.

I am (possibly) splitting hairs... but be clear that the group games at
National Finals are extremely important.

Si