From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Jan 12 18:30:11 1999
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA25431
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:23:43 GMT
Received: from snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (snowdrop [137.205.192.31])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA25425
	for <Britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:23:41 GMT
Received: from post.mail.demon.net (post-11.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.40])
	by snowdrop.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA11095
	for <Britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:23:40 GMT
Received: from [158.152.139.88] (helo=london1.eulergroup.com)
	by post.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #2)
	id 1008TX-0005VQ-00
	for Britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:23:38 +0000
Received: by LONDON1 with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
	id <C5BYRKYZ>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:11:52 -0000
Message-ID: <3FEEBE10F61BD2119B0100805FB7A2E41EB264@LONSEX02>
From: "Wagstaff, Colin [euler:eti-lon]" <Colin.Wagstaff@eulergroup.com>
To: "'Britdisc'" <Britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Tour in Aber
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:11:52 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

All,

To put a couple of things straight.

My comments were made following a number of conversations with my team mates
of which a number had expressed their dislike for the location of Aber as a
tour event and some agreed they probably wouldn't go.
 
My comments purely stated initially, that I didn't think we (UTI) were all
going to travel to Aber, the fact I signed off as Col, UTI doesn't imply
that these are the comments of the whole team, do they, Dave?  They merely
identify who is making those comments.  I went on to state that I didn't
think UTI were going to go to Aber. 

Flame me all you like but I still ain't going to Aber for a tour event this
year.

Inevitable Riposte?

Col
Ex Druid!