From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Oct 26 10:15:29 1998
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA08158
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 10:02:45 GMT
Received: from tgis.co.uk (galahad.tgis.co.uk [195.188.4.6])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08151
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 10:02:42 GMT
Received: from syscap.com (p026.5399-3.saturn.ispc.net [212.46.128.166]) by tgis.co.uk (8.8.7/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA30047; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 10:02:29 GMT
Posted-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 10:02:29 GMT
Received: from [195.188.6.81] by syscap.com
     Mon, 26 Oct 98 09:53:06 +0000
X-Sender: pharvey@195.188.6.1
Message-Id: <v02130505b259f766eeec@[195.188.6.81]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 09:55:32 +0000
To: "Paolo A. Nistri" <GB-GAN@panduit.de>, britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk,
        Wayne_Retter@watsonwyatt.co.uk
From: pharvey@syscap.com (Peter Harvey)
Subject: Re[2]: Worlds Allocation - Scottish Teams -Reply
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Didn't druids win a tournament. once.

Harv

At 8:32 am 26/10/98, Paolo A. Nistri wrote:
>Erm, Wayne, when have druids EVER been at the top??? Must have
>missed that one.
>
>P.
>
>>>> <Wayne_Retter@watsonwyatt.co.uk> 10/23/98 11:13am >>>
>"Wigsy" <mfix6can@fs1.art.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>>Scott wrote:
><snip>
>>>If, however, the BUF has decided that it's six places should be split
>4/2,
>>>I would urge then to reconsider a 5/1 split -
>>>Sneeeky's being the only Scottish team that consistantly performed in 
>>>the tour.
>
>>Not sure of Nationals results but is this purely an altruistic 
>>question or have you got a more sinister motive?
>>Wigsy,
>
>Christian
>
>Maybe you boys "at the top" should pay a little more attention to the
>goings-on 
>lower down the rankings (or risk being toppled a la Druids)
>
>1. Catch 22
>2. UTI
>3= Chevron Action Flash
>3= Shotgun
>5. Fluid Druids
>6. Headrush
>
>... so (whether Shotgun reincarnates or not) unless Scott's thinking of
>changing
>teams (can YOU imagine "Purple and Lime don't go" Scott as Scum?) he's
>not got a
>more sinister motive
>
>Wayne
>Druid Scum, (unless qualification's in doubt...)