From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Oct 26 08:46:15 1998
Received: by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA20456
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:31:25 GMT
Received: from panduit.de (mail.panduit.de [195.88.88.125])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id IAA20439
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:31:20 GMT
Received: from D-Message_Server by panduit.de
	with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 09:38:17 +0100
Message-Id: <s6344309.082@panduit.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:32:33 +0100
From: "Paolo A. Nistri" <GB-GAN@panduit.de>
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk, Wayne_Retter@watsonwyatt.co.uk
Subject: Re[2]: Worlds Allocation - Scottish Teams -Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Erm, Wayne, when have druids EVER been at the top??? Must have
missed that one.

P.

>>> <Wayne_Retter@watsonwyatt.co.uk> 10/23/98 11:13am >>>
"Wigsy" <mfix6can@fs1.art.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>Scott wrote:
<snip>
>>If, however, the BUF has decided that it's six places should be split
4/2,
>>I would urge then to reconsider a 5/1 split -
>>Sneeeky's being the only Scottish team that consistantly performed in 
>>the tour.

>Not sure of Nationals results but is this purely an altruistic 
>question or have you got a more sinister motive?
>Wigsy,

Christian

Maybe you boys "at the top" should pay a little more attention to the
goings-on 
lower down the rankings (or risk being toppled a la Druids)

1. Catch 22
2. UTI
3= Chevron Action Flash
3= Shotgun
5. Fluid Druids
6. Headrush

... so (whether Shotgun reincarnates or not) unless Scott's thinking of
changing
teams (can YOU imagine "Purple and Lime don't go" Scott as Scum?) he's
not got a
more sinister motive

Wayne
Druid Scum, (unless qualification's in doubt...)