From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk Tue Jul 14 08:42:14 1998 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id IAA12055 for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:29:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from gatekeeper.sands.com (gatekeeper.sands.com [193.133.75.180]) by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA12049 for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:56 +0100 (BST) Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com id AA13508 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk); Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:53 +0100 Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com (Internal Mail Agent-2); Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:53 +0100 Received: by gatekeeper.sands.com (Internal Mail Agent-1); Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:28:53 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 98 08:18:36 GMT From: "Caedman Oakley" <Caedman.Oakley@uk.drsolomon.com> Message-Id: <9806149004.AA900430117@mailgate.sands.com> To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk Subject: Co-ed Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk Precedence: bulk This has probably been done to death, but anyways.... Seeing that there were 5(?) women's teams at Exeter, and some women playing on their regular teams only, -> How about more stictly co-ed tournaments? I would welcome the introduction of more co-ed tournaments. 3/4 splits are great, and would prevent the sport going into a Mens/Womens split. Ultimate is a mixed team sport as well as single sex, and it would be really good to see this happening. If I had a place that I could put on a tournament, it would be co-ed... That way people like Gun, UTI, etc would have to find 4/5 women to play. I know that this might seem to some out there that this is because I can't meet women through normal channels (you may be right), but I came into the sport with the co-ed ideal, and am a little sorry to see that it is being forgotten. (except by Red as far as I can see). Thanks for reading, Cads (Whiny Sappy Person)