From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Mon Jul 13 23:00:02 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id WAA15210
	for britdisc-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 22:48:30 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.compulink.co.uk (mail.compulink.co.uk [194.153.0.20])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA15205
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 22:48:27 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by mail.compulink.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.6) id WAA06083
	for britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 22:47:54 +0100 (BST)
X-Envelope-From: lholden@cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 98 22:46 BST-1
From: lholden@cix.compulink.co.uk (Louise Holden)
Subject: 3 games in a row
To: britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Cc: lholden@cix.compulink.co.uk
Reply-To: lholden@cix.compulink.co.uk
Message-Id: <memo.532956@cix.compulink.co.uk>
X-Mail-Software: Ameol2
X-URL: http //www.ameol.com
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Since Kevin raised the issue I feel I have to comment about the schedule 
at Exeter not on Sunday but on Saturday.

I appreciate the efforts of Kevin and his team in the conditions but I 
just don't feel that some of the arrangements were acceptable at a tour 
event.

I understand that late withdrawal of teams probably caused the odd 
arrangements for the bottom two pools. However having decided to have one 
team in each play an extra game was it really necessary to have them play 
3 in a row? and on pitches which were at opposite ends of the site!!!

Playing two games on Sunday on a pitch with no lines marked was just the 
icing on the cake.

I guess that if it had been a glorious sunny weekend I probably wouldn't 
of cared, but it wasn't and I do.


Paul Holden