From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Tue Apr  7 17:21:26 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id QAA00602
	for britdisc-outgoing; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 16:28:55 +0100 (BST)
Received: from curlew.cs.man.ac.uk (curlew.cs.man.ac.uk [130.88.13.7])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA00541
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 16:28:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ccg.acu.man.ac.uk [130.88.17.200] 
	by curlew.cs.man.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.81 #4)
	id 0yMaIh-0006TP-00; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 16:28:40 +0100
Received: from ccMail by ccg.acu.man.ac.uk (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.00.02)
    id AA891962912; Tue, 07 Apr 98 16:28:35 GMT
Message-Id: <9804078919.AA891962912@ccg.acu.man.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R6.00.02
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 98 16:28:25 GMT
From: "Rob Mitchell"<admrwm@ccg.acu.man.ac.uk>
To: <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Indoor Tour Events?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk


     
          
Thanks Jester,

I knew it would simply be a matter of time before someone cracked and made a 
reasoned and serious reply to Lawrence's mail. Congratulations and heartfelt 
thanks, youare a prince among men and have made my miserable day. Now check the 
date on the original mail.

love rob

chevron action flash

    
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Indoor Tour Events?
Author:  <j.m.wilson@dundee.ac.uk> at smtpgate
Date:    07/04/98 14:06


Hi all
Remember this a week ago?
     
     
>Lawrence wrote:
     
>that in light of the sometimes appalling weather conditions
>towards the beginning and end of the outdoor season, maybe we should 
>consider holding the first Tour event as an INDOOR tournament- thus 
>also making the tour champions the UNDISPUTED champions of British 
>Ultimate.
>I've thought long and hard about these changes, and general views and 
>comments would be much appreciated.
     
     
Lawrence, Lawrence, Lawrence. ARE YOU SERIOUS?!  You are asking 
Ultimate teams to play in two different versions of the same game to prove 
they are the best.  By your rational (and assuming the Brazilian football 
sqaud will win the World Cup) Ronaldo, Romario and Co. would then have 
to beat all the other World Cup qualified nations in a Five a Side indoor 
tourney with smaller goals, a wooden floor, a smaller pitch in a shorter 
game.
     
I'm sorry, but indoor Ultimate is a different game from outdoor.  Don't get 
me wrong, I really enjoy indoor tournaments and great skill is always 
demonstrated, but take away the protection of the walls and roof and let the 
weather have a go and a team really has to dig deap to perform well.
     
The Dublin Tourney last weekend was a prime example, driving wind and 
sometimes rain forced a short game and the mud underfoot took away some 
pace.
     
I believe what demonstrates true skill is a team that is not only good enough 
to out play its opposition, but to overcome the weather too.
     
All the bester
Jester
Shooting Star* and Sorcerer
NO SOUP FOR YOU!