From britdisc-owner@csv.warwick.ac.uk  Thu Mar 26 12:01:10 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) id LAA11685
	for britdisc-outgoing; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 11:43:12 GMT
Received: from clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk (root@clover-fddi [137.205.4.2])
	by pansy.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA11662
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 11:43:07 GMT
Received: from exchpk01.chelt.ac.uk (exchpk01.chelt.ac.uk [194.66.194.228])
	by clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA01516
	for <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 11:43:02 GMT
Received: by exchpk01.chelt.ac.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52)
	id <01BD58AC.460EB4B0@exchpk01.chelt.ac.uk>; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 11:42:36 -0000
Message-ID: <c=GB%a=_%p=CHELT%l=PARKLAN/PARKEXCH/000918CA@exchpk01.chelt.ac.uk>
From: "HUGHES, Chris" <CHughes@chelt.ac.uk>
To: "britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk" <britdisc@csv.warwick.ac.uk>,
        "emma-jayne.slater@gartner.com" <emma-jayne.slater@gartner.com>
Subject: RE: Women's Rule
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 11:34:00 -0000
X-Mailer:  Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-britdisc@warwick.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

E-J wrote;

>     We both feel that perhaps more people could have become involved about
>     the subject over the Brit Disc forum for discussion, perhaps more so
>     than discussions about the tournament reports!!

Perhaps E-J has a point; whilst this fascinating discussion on
tournament reports evolved into a rather impressive display of new
techniques with a flame-thrower by Ben and Rog (is that as far as you've
got in 400 generations, Roger; you can't be impressed with your
progress), some perhaps more serious points have been pushed aside, with
very few people commenting.

I think people with views need to put them on britdisc for all to see to
start the debate, rather like the newsletters, instead of mailing in
private. OK it means you've got to be prepared to get shouted at, but if
everyone is not prepared to have a discussion, then Si will just end up
basing the rules on a few peoples opinions.

Lets keep the entertinment factor going, but lets also get some
consideration of some serious points. (Don't complain Roger; maybe we'll
get more people on Britdisc, and you can try your rapier wit out on
them,- us neaderthals are too stupid to notice)

Chris